Moog Music Forum

Share Ideas and Pass the word

Another Idea for a Moog Product That Isn't The Polysynth...

In a Moog Mood? Here's a forum for discussion of general Moog topics.

Another Idea for a Moog Product That Isn't The Polysynth...

Postby peterkadar » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:08 pm

Right now Moog are on the verge of shipping the Taurus 3 pedals.

There's been a lot of talk about hoping for a new Moog polysynth to compete with the Andromeda A6 and the DSI Prophet '08. I would love to see Memorymoog Voyager - or see them do with the Memorymoog what they did with the Taurus. But the general opinion is that something like that would be cost prohibitive and a huge gamble for a small company that can't afford to release products that don't sell.

So instead of a polysynth, what if Moog did a Liberation reissue?

I'm normally quite opposed to these kind of synths, but most of them have looked plasticky and cheap for the last 20 years. There are some nicer looking examples of ones made with wood elsewhere on the forum.

Here's my shopping list:

1) Wood craftmanship that would look aesthetically similar to 'classic' guitars and basses. Possibly a plain version, like the theremins, that you can finish yourself and save some $$

2) Modern amenities like presets and excellent midi control. Like the difference between a Taurus 1 and a T3.

3) Relatively light weight.

I only played the Liberation once, but from what I recall, the monosynth sounded really good, and there was a basic polysynth section using divide-down circuitry. I wonder what could be done with divide-down circuitry in a modern context...

Also, I could see something like this looking really good with either a floor or rack full of Moogerfoogers.

Thoughts?
peterkadar
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:04 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Klopfgeist » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:13 pm

I think "keytars" are only good as controllers. A modern Moog would be too costly and nicely made to just strap on and run around the stage with. I do not think anyone would buy a Moog just as a midi controller to control another synth offstage.
So this thing only plays one note?

http://soundcloud.com/unarius
http://www.youtube.com/user/plague1715
User avatar
Klopfgeist
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:50 pm
Location: Carlsbad, CA

Postby Mr Arkadin » Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:33 pm

To be honest it would only make sense as a rackmount. Then you may as well just get a Voyager RME and use any MIDI keytar (stick a Moog sticker on if you like).

However i was always interested in the Liberation - is it much different from the MG-1? i'd like to see something a bit quirkier like a Multimoog (without the global warming-inducing circuits!).
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/theoriginalmrarkadin
Mr Arkadin
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:43 am
Location: London, Airstrip One

Postby EricK » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:30 pm

+1 on Liberation II.
Gear: Moog upper and lower ball joints, sway bar, Moog 152C213 Brushless PWM Controller , digital servo drive, Andy Moog keychain.

Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=11672
EricK
 
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:09 pm

Re: Another Idea for a Moog Product That Isn't The Polysynth

Postby MC » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:48 pm

peterkadar wrote:So instead of a polysynth, what if Moog did a Liberation reissue?


As a midi controller, yes.

Reissue the synth engine - great big NO.

I used to own a Liberation, it was the weakest moog synth in my arsenal (the filter has no balls). The Rogue or MG-1 was a better lead synth. The Lib only got used for the solo in Frankenstein in my weekend band. I tried to find other uses but it has a really wimpy filter. It couldn't even put out a decent bass. When the Voyager came along, I sold it.

If it could be retrofitted as a MIDI controller, I would've kept it. It had great LH control features and aftertouch, a shame it couldn't be MIDI'd.

Would Moog sell a thousand? Doubt it...
Gear list: '04 Saturn Ion, John Deere X300 tractor, ganged set of seven reel mowers for 3 acres of lawn, herd of sheep for backup lawn mowers, two tiger cats for mouse population control Oh you meant MUSIC gear Oops I hit the 255 character limi
MC
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Painted Post NY

Postby superd2112 » Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:28 am

It would be hard to top the new Roland Axe Synth as a keytar-style MIDI controller. The Axe has great performance controls, a really nice built-in poly synth engine, and you can play your existing Moogs from it without breaking the bank. As MC stated, I doubt there would be much of a market for a Liberation.

Sooner or later, Moog needs to tackle the poly synth. How about making an expandable poly? Users could purchase the keyboard & chassis as a 4-voice or even a mono, and expand it by installing additional voice & modulation boards as their budgets allow. Zero presets or a thousand, 1 LFO simpleness or 8 LFO insanity, 4, 6, 8 or 16 voices, all defined by the user.
User avatar
superd2112
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Colorado

Postby EricK » Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:03 am

I say that everyone who wants a polysynth from Moog, take the Taurus 3 as a lesson, and start saving for it NOW. Its probably going to be very expensive and you might as well start putting back your pre order nest egg for the future when and if they decide to say

"Okay were going to make only 1000 polysynths and we need a 2000 dollar deopsit and we need at least 750 orders before the project is a go" or something like that.


I certianly wouldn't want to be caught broke the day they announce that.......first the constellation system, then the world.

Eric
Gear: Moog upper and lower ball joints, sway bar, Moog 152C213 Brushless PWM Controller , digital servo drive, Andy Moog keychain.

Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=11672
EricK
 
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:09 pm

Postby Sir Nose » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:25 pm

I'd like to see a sequencer and drum machine combo. An analog drum synth with a dedicated sequencer along with a sequencer that could control 4 external devices each with CV outs and MIDI. It sticks a lot closer to the monosynth niche Moog has currently been on. It could integrate any of the moog synths, foogers, and control processors.
Sir Nose
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:15 am

Postby latigid on » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:21 pm

Sir Nose wrote:I'd like to see a sequencer and drum machine combo. An analog drum synth with a dedicated sequencer along with a sequencer that could control 4 external devices each with CV outs and MIDI.


Minus the MIDI to CV, what you've described is basically the JoMoX XBase999 (/888).

A good little drum machine with often overpowering bass, but the UI is a little lacking.

As far as the OP goes, I don't think "wood craftmanship" and "relatively light weight" go too well together. :) How about Starlabs, even though the designs are a bit '80s:

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image



Only $5895 for the last one, MoogGuitar instead, anyone?


http://www.starrlabs.com/products/ztars

There's always the custom shop too.
User avatar
latigid on
 
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby EricK » Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:44 pm

Moog Custom Engineering part II.....

It would be very nice, but if it is anything like the Fender Custom shop, just mentioning the word custom would be like adding a few thousand...and guess what...they would probably startmaking modules again.
Gear: Moog upper and lower ball joints, sway bar, Moog 152C213 Brushless PWM Controller , digital servo drive, Andy Moog keychain.

Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=11672
EricK
 
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:09 pm

Postby peterkadar » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:22 am

No offence intended, but I am so NOT feeling those Starlabs controllers. Yeck!!

There were some nice examples of controllers made from wood somewhere on the site... it might have been in reference to ribbon controllers or something... I'll try to find the link and post it when I can.

Anyway, I didn't think they looked too bad.

I can't get onboard the new Roland AX-synth either.. again, cheap and plasticky.

However, I think I agree with those that have stated that if it's important enough, get a midi controller and control a LP or Voyager from that instead.

The Liberation seemed interesting to me, but a lot of time has passed since I first saw one. Of course, my memory of synths tends to be viewed through rose coloured glasses sometimes... :oops:
peterkadar
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:04 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby Voltor07 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:21 am

If they stuck a Little Phatty into a wood keytar and added divide down polyphony, I would be on that like a pig in you-know-what! :shock:

A Liberation reissue (meaning, exact replica) would be, as MC stated, not a good idea. But take the LP boards and put them into a Liberation-type enclosure complete with ribbon controller on the neck, hell yes that would be AMAZING!
Little Phatty Amos Gaynes Signature Edition, CP-251, MF-102&103, EHX #1 Echo, Peavey KB/A 60, Farfisa Matador-R, Taurus III #0030, Walking Stick ribbon controller, Voltor box, MacBook. ~Join Dr. Steel's army: see my profile for how to join~
Voltor07
 
Posts: 3548
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 3:04 am
Location: Waukegan, IL USA

Postby Mr Arkadin » Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:04 am

Voltor07 wrote:But take the LP boards and put them into a Liberation-type enclosure complete with ribbon controller on the neck, hell yes that would be AMAZING!


Amazingly heavy i think you mean :D.
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/theoriginalmrarkadin
Mr Arkadin
 
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:43 am
Location: London, Airstrip One

Postby _DemonDan_ » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:28 pm

Mr Arkadin wrote:Amazingly heavy I think you mean :D.

I have to agree. In this day and age of cheap and reliable wireless MIDI transmitters/receivers
it would seem far more effective to have a strap on controller that's lightweight and has lots of
real-time knobs/sliders that can control any/all of your analog gear that has MIDI.

That way, the analog synth doesn't have to be compromised just so that it can be lightweight,
not cumbersome, resistant to stage abuse, battery powered, and yet reasonably priced. That's
a tall order for something that not every keyboardist will buy.

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/MidAir.html

http://www.midijet.com/products/midijet.asp
_ :twisted: _DemonDan_ :twisted: _
User avatar
_DemonDan_
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:52 pm

Postby peterkadar » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:43 am

Agreed. So it seems a small group of us have deemed the Liberation idea, in whatever form - unfeasable.

Here's something else, of course in lieu of a true Memorymoog remake ( my true wish, BTW)...

I've seen some videos recently of a Moog Opus 3. It's been years since someone did a divide-down synth - probably for good reasons, but still..
I have to say that the examples I've heard didn't sound that organ like unless intended. I know what the triggering is like, because I have owned a string machine in the past. The youtube stuff I saw was actually pretty cool sounding.

Question: do we feel that this type of technology has something new to offer in a modern day context, or were divide down oscs the obsolete Neanderthal on the way to musical Homo Sapiens?
peterkadar
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:04 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Next

Return to Moog Music General Topics Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests